Imagined community

Imagined societyAccording to Benedict Anderson, what is an Imagined Community? How does this tie in to the present-day(a) conception?I am of the opinion that my life belongs to the biotic fraternity, and as long as I live it is my privilege to do for it whatever I fucking George Bernard Shaw (Wisdom Quotes, 2009). Such views demonstrate that communities ar an integral affair of day-to-day life inside the coetaneous world, be this in a tiny, remote village in rural India or the thriving upper-case letter city of Beijing, China. This essay examines communities within the inter acresal sp here(predicate), steering in the main on Benedict Andersons surmise of Imagined Communities. The first section of this essay examines Anderson as an academic scholar and his views towards demesnealism, including of course a detai lead understanding of his guess of Imagined Communities. The assist section then goes on to explore opposite governmental theorists scoop out on Anderso ns rub down, poreing on leash much(prenominal) theorists Ernest Gellner, Anthony D. metalworker and Eric Hobsbawm. This theory and reasoning behind Andersons and these three different theorists work, is then apply as the can on which to build when looking at the coetaneous world, focusing on the case study of commodious Britain and how this study is of relevance to contemporary political issues. Communities within Britain ar examined in name of the imagi tribe Anderson refers to, that is to say the Ukrainian confederation and overly the Sikh community, both(prenominal) within multiethnical British society. Andersons background is that of anthropology and when assessed, it is displace that he f exclusivelys within the Modernist shallow of intellection, arguing that realms atomic number 18 apparently a product of new-fashi anedity, in population to cater to political, economic and military demands. Andersons theory of Imagined Communities has been widely sprea d and use to the field of inter patriot relations and political science, a theory which has been potent in carefully examining the politics of identity and the formation of communities crossways the globe, also known as matterism. Anderson explores the new nation in m championtary value of its developing throughout history, aiming to understand the emergence of these nations and how they render remained as nations in scathe of status (Higson, 1998, p.355). studyism took form and began as an ideology during the eighteenth century, and more than recently has underg one a global style across the varying borders and boundaries of nations. It has three generic goals depicted object autonomy, national unity and national identity, and for nationalists, a nation keep non survive without a sufficient degree of all three (Smith, 2001, p.9). National identity in posticular is fundamental to the order of the contemporary international sphere. According to Anderson (1991) and th en, the make and construction of nation states is an imitative action in that it follows confusable patterns and trends as used by fellow nation states. Nationalism, in Andersons (1991) eyes is thus an instrument and product of such social constructions and all of this was in actual fact an American construction. Additionally, he contends that nation build is consistent of and on a par with fictional narratives, a luff which hold ins which Smith (2001), discussed ulterior on in this essay. With such a clear focus on nationalism, Anderson (1991) studies the idea of social status of a community, the idea of membership as boundaries defining us and them, and the idea of the community as an enough comradeliness, thus collectively leading to the creation of an identity. Under the umbrella of nationalist thought therefore, Anderson is largely interested in the formation and preservation of political identities. His key argument is as follows communities are in fact imagined ones as, in truth, indivi multiples residing in one particular place i.e. Britain, will never know, see, meet, talk or dupe any sort of relationship with all otherwise residents, yet this ideological conceit of a British community put away exists. Anderson thus is focusing on nationalism, in particular nations and their identity building processes, a nation be an imagined political communityimagined as both inherently especial(a) and sovereign (Anderson, 1991, p.7). In his argument, the a nation is imagined as limited in that, even the one applying the greatest number of human universes creations, each community has finite boundaries, beyond which are other nations (Anderson, 1991, p.7). The nation is imagined as sovereign as the concept emerged during a time in which Enlightenment and Revolution were destroying the legitimacy of the divinely-ordained hierarchical dynastic in truthm (Anderson, 1991, p.7). Finally, the nation is imagined as a community as despite contrariety and exploitive behaviour that may occur, the nation remains a deep, horizontal comradeship (Anderson, 1991, p.7). Such imagined communities are in actual fact socially constructed entities, consisting of individuals who collect similar, if not identical, interests, these interests forming the basis for their grouping choices and decisions, and allowing the individuals to identify with one another. Andersons theory therefore comes from the location of individuals within specific ordered communities, as members of bounded communities whose members gift honey oil traits and concerns. His idea of this type of a community existing emerges from how the ordinary human bes, according to him, identifies and understands themselves with deference to the community of their nation. As a result, all individuals occupy a horizontal relationship with all other members of their supposed imagined community and this creates identity. Such identity abides safety and security to members of the imagined community, providing a sense of be to a group of population who are on the same wavelength and have similar interests and motivations (Anderson, 1991). This is of course, opposed to the previous identification which was wholly concerned with exist religious systems and dynasties, which have now collapsed. Anderson (1991) then goes on to examine the transcend in access to privileged scripts and discourse such as Latin, the movement to eradicate ideas and commands of the monarchy and divine rules of power and finally the emergence of print capitalism in edges of the media and how this is related to the concept of nations. The final omen here is of greatest relevance to this essays discussion. From first thought, it is common to think that no real relationship exists between media and communities, yet on closer inspection, it becomes clear that this is not the case. Anderson (1991) argues that the media is the key group creating these imagined communities through their mass audience targeting procedures. The media practically makes normalisations to the earth and when thought about, is most definitely an imagined community in itself. Anderson (1991) therefore argues that national media and education systems have a critical consumption in ensuring a nation imagines itself as a coherent, meaningful and homogenous community (Higson, 1998, p.355). His aboriginal concentration in time lies with freshspapers, which he argues are a fundamental part of print-capitalism, this being the key commodity in the generation of new ideas and concepts (Anderson, 1991, p.37). Print-capitalism contri anded greatly to the imagined communities that exist within nations and will continue to do so in the future. He argues that newspapers allow shared out experiences of resenting authority to take form, this not being beneficial as this gives rise to the marketplace, where print-capitalism is produced and invoked within consumer society in name of profitability. Print-capitalism is, in Andersons opinion a commodity which is vital to current and extravert generations of completely new ideas and concepts (Anderson, 1991, p.37). His argument focuses primarily on the impact of the Reformation, this being the coalition between Protestantism and print-capitalism, exploiting cheap popular editions, quickly created large new reading publicsand simultaneously mobilized them for politico-religious purposes (Anderson, 1991, p.40). He posits that much of the success of the Reformation is as a result due to print-capitalism itself (Anderson, 1991, p.39). Thus in Andersons critique with regards to the foretell of the media in the public sphere and whether or not they invoke public debate, his answer is yes i.e. it was a vehicle for the American war of independence. The key pattern however given in his work is that relating to the Protestant and print-capitalism coalition, which he argues, was detrimental through the exploitation of cheap popular pri nt-works (Anderson, 1991, p.40). Such administrative vernaculars (Anderson, 1991, p.41) light-emitting diode to religious and printing upheaval during the sixteenth century, and is regarded by himself as an strong-minded factor in the erosion of the sacred imagined community (Anderson, 1991, p.41). In wrong of imagined communities and its relationship with the media, film and cinema are good areas to explore. Film is a lot indicative of consensual images of communities (Higson, 1998, p.355) and is keen to show individuals from varying backgrounds coming unneurotic in shared interests. The British musical Sing As We Go (1934) (cited in Higson, 1998, p.355) for example deals with this same image as explained in a higher place and ends with the imagined community being explicitly nationalized (Higson, 1995, cited in Higson, 1998, p.356) in the final scene. It is important to cope though that not all of the imagined communities Anderson refers to are united. Particularly within th e contemporary multi cultural location that is Great Britain, nations can be presented and represented as being in disarray (Higson, 1998, p.356). Higson (1998) refers to the British film named The Beautiful Laundrette and how this is demonstrative pronoun of such a thing, providing images of social and cultural disturbance and fragmentation (Higson, 1998, p.356) as opposed to images of consensual imagined communities. This is therefore raises questions of what it is like to be British and to hold such an identity. Films like this consequently oppose what Anderson claims to be the truth, pageanting that national identity in contexts like this one are not as consensual but as hybrid, not as pure but as variegated (Higson, 1998, p.356) and so this challenges Andersons testify. This theory of imagined communities has a lot led to various branches of thought, one of the key ones with relation to this topic being that of imagined geographies, a concept which has emerged from Edward S aids work on Orientalism a theoretical framework which argues that Europeans define themselves against their cultural contestants i.e. people from the Orient and as a result define themselves against this. Back to Imagined geographies though, this is a form of social constructivism, referring to the perception of space and boundaries within texts, illustrations and of course, discourse. Arguably, there is no real geography and that imagined geographies can be compared with, thus posing problems of comparative analysis. So the argument lies that such imagined geographies must not be interpreted as given, but rather they should be deconstructed in order to display the various power sources which have been embedded in them. Ultimately, although Anderson is sceptical of the general public in their decision to be part of imagined communities, he acknowledges that in the current day and age, nationalism and the idea of community has taken to other extremes i.e. projecting dismay and ha tred towards the separate, being deeply affiliated with antiblack and discriminative behaviour (Anderson, 1991, p.141.) He critiques this though by reinforcing how such communities are supposed to bring individuals unitedly as opposed to dividing them advertize, and thus communities need to be reminded that nations inspire love, and often profoundly self-sacrificing love (Anderson, 1991, p.141). Other theorists however conflict with what Anderson (1991) poses as the function of nation building, namely Ernest Gellner, Anthony D. Smith and Eric Hobsbawm. Their proposals of national identity vary with respect to one another. Firstly, anthropologist and philosopher Gellner (1983) argues that nationalism is eventually political in that it acts as the foundation for politics and nations as being on an equal footing. In his critique, nationalism only emerged within the modern sphere very recently, becoming a necessity in sociological terms, and thus has not been embedded within histor y. Smith (2001) was a disciple of Gellner yet did not completely agree with the argument made by his teacher. His argument therefore depends on his creation of an approach to nationalism termed ethnosymbolism, this being a combination of traditional as well as modern views toward the theory and practice of national identities (Smith, 2001, p.13). Smith (2001) distinguishes between the concept of the term nation and another word he terms ethnie, this being a named human community affiliated to a homeland, possessing common myths of ancestry, shared memories, one or more elements of shared culture, and a notice of solidarity at to the lowest degree among the elites (Smith, 2001, p.13). Thus in his critique, the imagined communities Anderson speaks of do have a cultural and diachronic background to them, and so they arent completely imagined but have some kernel behind them. Smith (2001) on the other hand, studies nationalism in terms of ethnic groupings. To him, the concept of the nation is a named human community occupying a homeland, and having common myths and a shared history, a common culture, and a measure of solidarity at least among the elites (Smith, 2001, p.13). Within this though he narrows down further his understanding of nations, consisting of what he terms ethnie (Smith, 2001, p.13) a named human community connected to a homeland, possessing common myths of ancestry, shared memories, one or more elements of shared culture, and a measure of solidarity at least among the elites(Smith, 2001, p.13). Hobsbawm (1992) too examines nationalism, a concept which he refers to as the same as defined by Gellner primarily a principle which holds that the political and national unit should be harmonious (Gellner, 1983, p.1, cited in Hobsbawm, 1992, p.9). He contends that imagined communities act as a shield for and to religious-based nation states, which in turn allows individuals from a vast array of backgrounds to come in concert through the notion of compromise (Hobsbawm, 1992, p.14). One of his key arguments is that nations are dual phenomena (Hobsbawm, 1992, p.10), by which he means that they are socially constructed from both above and below, with regards to the assumptions, hopes, needs, longings and interests of ordinary people (Hobsbawm, 1992, p.10). Thus he reinforces the central and underlying wideness of nationalism throughout history in relation to political evolution. With respect to this, we identify that no real national conscience is forged within his text, and later on he makes clear the number of incited mass movements of nations i.e. he refers to the liberalisation of countries like Italy. National identity has a huge role to play within countries across the globe. In particular, it is focused on and can be identified during sporting games i.e. football or cricket, avid fans documentation their nation to be successful and triumphant. National identity can however also be associated with negativity and can cre ate tensions, as demo politically within international relations more generally. This section focuses on Britain as its key contemporary example but compares and contrasts the experiences within Britain with those of other countries too. Britain, quite clearly, consists of a multicultural society, one which is made up of a variety of community groupings. Community-World (2009) provides examples of legion(predicate) of the community groupings that are existent in modern day Britain, i.e. regional, ethnic, religious, charity/voluntary and finally miscellaneous ones which overwhelm vegetarianism and so on. In many cases, such communities are reflective of Andersons thought of imagined communities. An example of this can be seen with respect to the South-Asian community in Britain, make of Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Sri Lankans and many more, yet all come together under the umbrella term of South-Asian community even though it is most definitely likely that not all of thes e community members know each other nor have they seen each other nor, in reality, will they ever really do so. Such a community, although to be congratulated in bringing people of similar backgrounds together, is in actual fact a socially constructed entity according to Anderson. In my critique of this however, such groupings are embedded in human disposition in that terms like this have not been created as a product of society and societal views but rather because of religious, cultural and diachronic backgrounds. Thus they are not socially constructed. Andersons concentration of the media too is profitable here when looking at Britain in that, in the contemporary world, his point that the print media, namely newspapers, is largely to blame for the creation of communities is only sensibly true. This is due to the rise of other media forms, particularly the internet, which has led to newspaper sales and general success of them falling over recent years. Greenslade (2009) in r edirect examination of 2009 and the past decade identifies the spectacular defy of this once thriving perseverance the Daily Mail recorded a fall from 2,777,501 to 1,260,019, a decline of 55%, whilst the Daily Express experienced sale plunges of 33.7%, the Daily wire losses of nearly 27% and the Guardian a fall of scarcely over 23%. Although newspapers are now widely available online, feature the previous paper form with the recent phenomenon of the internet, this does contradict with Andersons core argument. As sales of print newspapers have fallen, this suggests that readership too has declined and thus communities are less(prenominal) likely today to identify with communities within such media. Fisk (2010) makes an interesting point though in his work, arguing that many human communities within Great Britain have been abandoned since the Middle-Ages and so he works to commemorate such communities and identify their reasons for abandonment. Contrastingly, mansion (2004) exa mines the process of immigrants becoming citizens, with a particular focus on the Sikh community within Britain, namely second-generation ones. Her argument is that cultural politics have a huge role to play and in terms of the formation of nations, yet many more cultural processes are also at work the role the media has in circulating religious, national and ethnic illustrations and political imaginaries youth movement between cultural worlds in the home, at school and professionally the frequently contradictory nature of the education system and the cultural matters which flow across transnational and diaspora networks and communities (Hall, 2004, p.118). Thus Hall (2004) is suggesting that although this Sikh community may live and reside in Britain, this does not instantaneously make them a fundamental part of the imagined British community, but rather due to their heritage and ancestral roots, many British Sikhs often find themselves to be torn between identifying with Britain and identifying with their parents country of origin. Hence individuals can be part of a series of imagined communities as opposed to just one as posed by Anderson (1991). Hall (2004) does however agree with Anderson (1991) to the extent that the media is incredibly influential in the contagion of national and cultural identities across various borders and boundaries. Similarly, Smith and Jackson (1999) studied imagined communities with respect to Ukrainian communities living in Bradford, UK. Their argument was one of this sense of community, being mold by Ukrainian history and the ever-changing global political climate (Smith and Jackson, 1999, p.367). For many Ukrainians living in Bradford, Ukraines independence in 1991 was symbolic of de-stabling an unsettled, often imaginary, sense of Ukrainianness (Smith and Jackson, 1999, p.384). Furthermore, they propose that recent cultural and historical change has led to an over-complication of the way in which the Ukrainian community within Bradford, UK is imagined and thus poses problems in terms of narratives and discourse. In my critique, although cultural influences are considered by all of the previously discussed political theorists, economics in terms of social status and inequality is not considered. It is no surprise that the creation and preservation of imagined communities as discussed by Anderson (1991) leads to fractionalization (Alesina et al, 2003, p.155). My argument contends that such fractionalization is the cause of the observed rise in cross country inequalities, Britain included, and Anderson (1991) fails to account for this. A broad view of heterogeneity demonstrates that anything that generates groups, as Andersons theory does, has both political and economic consequences, ultimately leading to greater inequality. In Britain for example, we can see that Central capital of the United Kingdom, in most cases, is a super affluent area. The outskirts of Greater London though vary in affluenc e such that groups are formed and located according to these same groups. look into has proved such theses to be correct i.e. Alesina et al (2003) examined approximately one hundred and ninety countries, concluding that ethnic, religious and linguistic fractionalization (Alesina et al, 2003, p.155) increases corruption, infant mortality and illiteracy, and reduces democracy and political rights indexes. Thus this supports my point of critique, that although imagined communities bring people together from similar backgrounds and who have shared interests, the creation of such groupings leads to divisions and ultimately, in many cases, such divisions are indicative of social status, welfare and affluence. Hence Anderson (1991), on with Gellner (1983), Smith (2001) and Hobsbawm (1992), did not investigate this. Theorists in future should therefore look for this area, building on the work mentioned above. In an age where it is extremely common for progressive, cosmopolitan intellect uals to sit on the near-pathological character of nationalism, its roots in fear and hatred of the Other, and its affinities with racism (Anderson, 1991, p.141), it is crucial to remember at all multiplication that nations transpire love, and often profoundly self-sacrificing love (Anderson, 1991, p.141). Hence whether communities within these nations are imagined or not, which Anderson (1991) would say they are, they act as the fundamental foundation for society to communicate, evolve, exchange information and knowledge and ultimately to progress. Thus communities are incredibly important in multicultural Britain but also on a transnational scale too. To conclude, Andersons work on Imagined Communities is one which has been used largely within the realm of political science and international studies. It does provide the reasoning as to why people commune together in the majority of instances yet at the same time, is rather broad in its explanation and thus has limited generalisatio n and applicability to the modern world that is the twenty-first century. The theory of Imagined Communities is rather useful though in terms of understanding community and group formation with regards to historical, religious and cultural contexts across the world. This essay has examined what Anderson terms to be an Imagined Community and how this has been used within the friendly Sciences, in particular International Relations and Political Science. It has then later gone on to look at Britain as a contemporary example of how a series of Imagined Communities have been formed i.e. the Sikh community and the Ukrainian community. Thus it is important to recall that nationalism is not simply a sociological or cultural phenomena it is also a flop political instrument whichhas played an important part in both the creation and the reform of modern states throughout the world (Jackson, 2003, p.610). BibliographyAlesina, A.et al (2003) Fractionalization in Journal of Economic Growth, Vo l.8, No.2, pp.155-194.Anderson, B.R. (1991) Imagined Communities Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Revised ed.), London Verso.Community-World (2009) Community-World UK online unattached from http//www.community-world.co.uk/ (2001) in Durham, M.G. and Kellner, D.M. (eds.) Media and heathenish Studies Keyworks, Oxford Blackwell PublishingFisk, A. (2010) Abandoned Communities online addressable from http//www.abandonedcommunities.co.uk/ Accessed fourteenth March 2010Gellner, E. (1983) Nations and Nationalism, Oxford Blackwell. Greenslade, R. (2009) Newspaper sales plunge over the decade online Available from http//www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/dec/14/national-newspapers-sales-decade Accessed 14th March 2010Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the earthly concern Sphere An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge Polity.Hall, K.D. (2004) The Ethnography of Imagined Communities The Cultural Production of Sikh Ethnicity in Britain in A nnals of the American academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 595, pp.108-121Higson, A. (1998) Nationality National Identity and the Media in Briggs, A. and Cobley, P. (eds.) The Media An Introduction, Harlow Longman, pp. 354-364Hobsbawm, E.J. (1992) Nations and Nationalism since 1780 Programme, Myth, earth (second ed.), Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Inglis, F. (1993) Cultural Studies, Oxford Blackwell.Jackson, J. (2003) Book Review Nationalism and the state John Brueilly, 2nd edition (Manchester Manchester University Press, 1993), pp. 474, 40.00 H.B., 14.99 P.B. in History of European Ideas, Vol.21, No.4, pp.608-610.Smith, A.D. (2001) Nationalism Theory, Ideology, History, Cambridge Polity. Smith, G. and Jackson, P. (1999) Narrating the nation the imagined community of Ukrainians in Bradford in Journal of Historical Geography, Vol.25, No.3, pp.367-387Wisdom Quotes (2009) Community Quotes online Available from http//www.wisdomquotes.com/cat_community.html